Home Blog Page 499

Mosman Makes Oil Find at Crestar-1 Well in NZ’s Petroleum Creek Project

0

Mosman Oil & Gas Limited, the New Zealand and Australia focused oil exploration and development company, announced Friday an update on its Petroleum Creek Project in New Zealand. At the Crestal-1 well, drilling has now finished at a depth of 823 feet (251 meters). Wireline logs were run, and the 4.5 inch casing has been run and cemented.

Based on the petrophysical analysis from its third party consultants, including SRK (Australia) Ltd, Mosman has determined that the oil encountered in both the Eight Mile formation and Cobden Limestone meet the definition of a Discovery in accordance with the New Zealand (NZ) legislation. As required, Mosman has reported this update to the Regulator, New Zealand Petroleum & Minerals (NZPAM).

Flow testing is planned for later in 2014 on both the Eight Mile Formation and the Cobden Limestone intervals at Crestal-1. With the successful results on these first two wells, the Company has achieved its initial exploration objectives as set out in the IPO in March and the results have provided Mosman with wealth of information from which it can further shape its drilling and appraisal program. Following these drilling results the Crestal-2 well will now be re-designed as an appraisal well which is anticipated to be drilled in September. Further drilling is now scheduled for October/November 2014, once additional seismic data has been integrated into the geological model.

This will focus on the next highest ranked exploration targets at Petroleum Creek. John W Barr, executive chairman of Mosman commented: “This positive result from Crestal-1 is another advance in the exploration and appraisal process and enables the team to tailor its next phase of drilling more effectively.”

This now concludes Mosman’s first phase of drilling at Petroleum Creek as the Company moves to the appraisal phase on Cross Roads-1 and Crestal-1, and as a result the weekly drilling updates will restart with the next phase of drilling. 

Source

Thailand Turns Off Tap on Gas Imports as Economy Falters

0

Thailand is cutting natural gas imports after consumption growth in Asia’s fourth-largest user of the fuel has sagged to two-decade lows, threatening to idle costly fuel import facilities and force suppliers to turn to rival buyers such as China. Growth in gas use has stalled as the economy has taken a hit from political turmoil, putting in doubt long-term plans to boost imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and buy more piped gas from neighbouring Myanmar as domestic output wanes.

PTT PCL, Thailand’s biggest energy conglomerate and sole gas supplier, has cut estimates for LNG imports and gas sales for this year, an executive of the firm said. That comes as slowing consumption for power and petrochemicals is reducing gas demand in Southeast Asia’s second-biggest economy.

State-controlled PTT has also cut its gas imports from Myanmar, which is now looking to China to take up some of the slack, a Myanmar government official said. PTT owns the $880 million, 5 million-tonne-per-year Map Ta Phut LNG import facility, the second-largest in Southeast Asia, and parts of cross-country pipelines running for hundreds of kilometres from Myanmar. The lower imports will mean these facilities risk being underutilised, analysts say.

A plan to expand the capacity of the Map Ta Phut terminal to import the supercooled gas could also be in jeopardy, they say. Thailand’s military seized power in May after nearly seven months of political deadlock that hurt tourism, domestic demand and confidence. The economy contracted 2.1 percent in January-March from the previous three months, and the central bank last month cut its 2014 growth forecast to 1.5 percent.  

“It will take at least 2-3 years for the situation to spring back to normalcy as we don’t see a government forming until mid- or late-2015,” said Sri Paravaikkarasu, an analyst at energy consultancy FGE, predicting annual gas demand growth would be around 2 percent over the next few years.

Thai gas demand grew just 0.4 percent in 2013, the lowest since 1989 when consumption fell 2 percent, data from the Energy Ministry’s website (www.eppo.go.th) showed. The 2013 growth compared with 7-8 percent in each of the previous three years. First-half 2013 demand was still a healthy 7 percent but nine-month demand slowed to 2.8 percent, showing the impact of the political unrest, which gathered pace in the third quarter. Full-year gas use for power generation rose by only 0.6 percent, while consumption by petrochemical plants fell 3.2 percent.

PTT CUTS TARGETS

The trend has continued, with Thailand consuming 4,423 million standard cubic feet per day (mmscfd) of gas in the first quarter, down 5.4 percent from a year ago, the Energy Ministry data showed. By comparison, 2013’s first quarter saw demand climb 8.2 percent. The first-quarter decline has led PTT to cut its LNG import target from the spot market this year to around 1.4-1.5 million tonnes from a previous estimate of 2 million tonnes, said Somkiat Masunthasuwan, executive vice president of the company’s natural gas supply and trading department.

PTT has also reduced its gas sales forecast this year by 1-2 percent from a previous estimate of 4,700-4,800 mmscfd. About 80-85 percent of Thai gas demand is met from local production and 12-16 percent from Myanmar, with LNG filling the remaining 3-4 percent. Prior to the unrest, annual demand growth was expected to remain at the 7-8 percent level, with LNG imports and supplies from Myanmar filling in a large chunk of the rise.

While Thailand’s 2015 LNG imports will rise by about half a million tonnes as a supply deal with Qatar kicks in, a fall in spot purchases will neutralise this, said FGE’s Paravaikkarasu. The declines in LNG spot imports may make suppliers seek alternative buyers, relegating Thailand to being a marginal player in the booming LNG business.

“Thailand will still be a significant LNG buyer in the long-term once domestic gas supply from the Gulf of Thailand begins to decline. However, for now, lower gas demand growth may impact its procurement of long-term LNG contracts and PTT’s plan to expand the Map Ta Phut regasification terminal,” said Zhixin Chong, analyst at energy consultant Wood Mackenzie.

Source

Atlantic Petroleum Starts Pegasus West Well Drilling

0

Atlantic Petroleum announces that drilling of the Pegasus West well 43/13b-7 has commenced on P1724 in the UKCS. The well is being drilled with the Noble Julie Robertson jackup rig in a water depth of about 95 feet. Pegasus West is being drilled approximately 7 km WSW of the 43/13b-6Z Pegasus North discovery well.


This well was drilled in 2010 by Centrica Energy and Volantis Exploration, now a subsidiary of Atlantic Petroleum, and was plugged and abandoned in January 2011 having encountered gas in the Carboniferous.

The Pegasus West prospect lies in the Southern North Sea, close to the producing Cavendish Field, and has a Carboniferous gas target. The rig is expected to be on location for over two months.

The well is operated by Centrica Energy who hold a 55% interest in the licence. Atlantic Petroleum holds 10% equity and the remaining equity 35% is held by Third Energy Offshore.

Ben Arabo, CEO, stated: “We are very pleased to announce the spud of the Pegasus West well. The well is designed to delineate the extent of the Pegasus Field, and if successful help to de-risk any future Pegasus development. This is Atlantic Petroleum’s third of four exploration wells in our planned 2014 drilling programme.”

Source

InterOil Suspends Wahoo-1 Drilling in PNG’s PPL474 on Safety Concerns

0

InterOil Corporation announced Monday that it has suspended the Wahoo-1 well in PPL474 in Papua New Guinea (PNG) after intersecting gas and higher-than-expected pressures that could compromise rig safety. Significant concentrations of methane, ethane, propane and butane have been recorded and are believed to be entering the well bore from permeable zones above the predicted reservoir zone, which is yet to be penetrated.

The gas is characteristic of thermogenic hydrocarbons, which are indicative of an active hydrocarbon-generating source rock. The Wahoo-1 well was designed for high pressures based on data from other wells in the region but the pressures have exceeded by nearly 50 percent even those of InterOil’s Antelope discovery, 105.6 miles (170 kilometers) to the north-west. After a review by drilling and engineering teams and expert advisers, InterOil has concluded that drilling ahead would pose an unacceptable safety risk to people and the rig. The company has received approval from the PNG Department of Petroleum and Energy to suspend the well.

OPERATIONS TO RESUME AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE

InterOil intends to resume operations as soon as practicable following a detailed review of well engineering, equipment and options, when the company is satisfied it is safe to proceed, and after the regulator has approved the company’s plans. An option includes testing of the gas-bearing permeable zones encountered in the Orubadi mudstone. Progress on Wahoo-1 has confirmed an effective seal in the Orubadi mudstone, as well as the presence of  thermogenic hydrocarbons, both of which are key components to a working petroleum system.

Further drilling is required to confirm the presence of a reservoir below the current total depth of the well before Wahoo can be considered a discovery.

Source

Hydrex, Subsea Industries Host Sales Conference

0

Recently Hydrex and Subsea Industries hosted an international sales conference which was attended by many of the companies’ agents from around the world.

The conference was a highly instructive event for all those attending and everyone left with renewed enthusiasm for selling and supporting Hydrex underwater repair and maintenance services and Ecospeed and Ecoshield in all parts of the world.

Agents attended from Canada (new agency just appointed), China, Croatia, Denmark, Greece, Japan, Russia, Sweden, with Hydrex sales personnel from the USA and Belgium. Hydrex International Sales Manager Rob Wolthuizen led the event.

There were technical and commercial presentations from Rob, Manuel Hof, Dave Bleyenberg and David Phillips, guest presentations from Mr. Gert Hendriksen, Managing Director of Maritime Propeller Repairs BV and Mr. Peter Zoeteman, Managing Director of Netherlands Maritime Technology.

There were also practical demonstrations of Hydrex technology and a tour of Antwerp harbor on a Hydrex workboat.

Feedback from the conference was excellent. It has promoted a greater spirit of cooperation amongst agents and between Hydrex and Subsea and its agencies.

The Hydrex/Ecospeed agency network has been expanding considerably recently.

Source

Rosneft, Petrobras Sign Natural Gas Accord For Brazil’s Amazon

0

Russian state oil group NK Rosneft’ AOA signed an agreement with Brazil’s state-run Petroleo Brasileiro SA to seek ways to sell natural gas trapped in Brazil’s remote Amazon jungle, the companies said on Monday. The companies did not immediately give details of the deal, except to say it is “a protocol of intentions.”

Rosneft owns 51 percent of HRT O&G, a Brazilian company that owns three giant oil and gas exploration blocks in the Solimoes Basin, west of Manaus, a city of about 1.8 million that is the capital of Amazonas state. They contain an estimated 542 million barrels contingent oil and equivalent natural gas (BOE) resources, 83 percent of it gas, according to HRT Participacoes em Petroleo, a Rio de Janeiro-based company that is Rosneft’s 49 percent partner in the Solimoes blocks.

Contingent resources are oil and gas that have been discovered but lack some factor that would make it commercial to produce. At current estimates, the resources are equivalent to the amount of oil the United States uses in about a month. The Rosneft-Petrobras agreement was signed during a state visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin to Brazil. The two countries also announced military, commercial and space-cooperation agreements.

HRT and Petrobras signed a memorandum of understanding to study Amazon gas sale options two years ago, when Rosneft held a minority stake in HRT through TNK-BP, its former joint venture with BP Plc . Despite that agreement and various studies, no solution was found.

Exploiting Amazon gas is difficult because of the distance from major population centers and complications in building pipelines in the jungle. The gas is separated from Manaus, the nearest city, by as much as 900 kilometers of impassible jungle. The nearest pipeline, owned by Petrobras, was built for its own oil and gas output in the region. To build the pipeline in the jungle, Petrobras had to adapt offshore pipe-laying techniques.

“We have different options … We need to sell the gas, and Petrobras has a gas transportation system which one could get access to, and we are going to discuss those issues,” Rosneft Chief Executive Officer Igor Sechin told reporters on the sidelines during one of Putin’s stops in Brazil.

Before Rosneft agreed to exercise an option to buy control of HRT last year, HRT was considering several projects for moving the gas to market. They included liquefied natural gas, gas to liquids technology that converts natural gas into gasoline and other fuels, electricity generation and industrial uses such as energy or heat for fertilizer or aluminum production.

Source

CRP Welcomes Number of Marine Consent Application Submissions

0

Chatham Rock Phosphate Managing Director Chris Castle is delighted at the quality and number of submissions in support of its Marine Consent application to the Environmental Protection Authority to extract phosphate nodules from the seabed on the Chatham Rise at the rate of 30 sq km a year.

While a final analysis of the submissions will not be available until early next week CRP understands around 240 submissions have been received with a healthy proportion of these in favour of the application. In contrast, 4,702 submissions were received in respect of the recent Trans-Tasman Resources application, with 99.5% opposing the proposal.

A preliminary analysis of the Chatham Rock Phosphate submissions reveals many applications from those with relevant expertise and/or with substantive arguments in favour of the Chatham Rise proposal.

Further, only a few dozen submitters wish to be heard at the hearing, in contrast with the 2,175 submitters that wished to be heard at the TTR hearings.

This lack of large numbers opposing our project implies a significantly higher level of community support. An additional benefit is the hearings will be much less burdened with repetitive, in-expert opinions and can more easily and effectively proceed with a more informed decision making process.

“We’ve had a great response from people and organisations who support our application because they recognise the environmental and economic benefits of the project. This includes eminent international scientists who have submitted because they think the merits of this project are so impressive. Their strong message is the comparatively minor environmental impacts can be managed and the potential benefits are simply too big to ignore.

“While we have yet to study the submissions in detail, we are disappointed by some of the inaccurate claims made by some opponents to our application. We welcome debate on our proposal but expect it to be based on facts. For example, some of the claims in the information KASM posted on its website for people to use for their pro-forma submissions are simply not true and do not reflect our proposed mining operations.”

CRP’s Marine Consent application to the EPA, filed in May, is working through a formal process to deliver a decision in November. The application, representing four years’ work and $27 million in investment, is the second under the Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Act, and will be considered in a full public process by an expert panel appointed by the EPA. The Marine Consent is the only major licence CRP now needs, having gained a mining permit for its phosphate extraction project in December.

Mr Castle said he remains confident the application will meet the tough standard demanded by the law, because of CRP’s comprehensive science and consultation-based approach to its proposed mining operations, mitigation and monitoring.

We’ve designed the way we plan to mine and how we monitor and mitigate any effects by building in the input of the many interested parties with whom we have consulted, to ensure their concerns are addressed. Throughout the past four and half years we’ve focused on building input from both stakeholders and scientists to ensure all the bases are covered in terms of environmental requirements.

“Critical to that has been the high quality science provided by NIWA and other advisers. Underscoring those efforts is the huge capability of our technical partner Boskalis whose resources, expertise and knowledge is simply unparalleled.

“Their engineers are able to draw on more than 100 years of expertise across 75 countries. Boskalis is undoubtedly the world leader in sea-based extraction operations and what has impressed us the most is how with every project the company undertakes, it devises innovative and environmentally sustainable methods, while always having safety as the first priority. It is the way Boskalis does business.”

CRP’s phosphate resource, located on the seabed of the Chatham Rise, offers fertiliser security for New Zealand’s primary industry, has big export and import substitution potential, as well as environmental benefits, making it a project of national significance.

Source

PGS Expects Weaker Q2 Results

0

Petroleum Geo-Services ASA (“PGS”) expects to report weaker Q2 results than current market expectations. Customers’ intentions with regard to seismic purchases, particularly MultiClient, have become less predictable recently. Accordingly, and considering the Q2 results, PGS lowers its full year EBITDA guidance to circa $850 million. It should be noted that because of this reduced predictability, the uncertainty range around the EBITDA guidance is wider than normal.

The weak Q2 results are mainly driven by lack of pre-funding for the Triton MultiClient survey in the Gulf of Mexico and to some extent by mobilization delays on some Marine Contract surveys, relating to permitting, weather and technical problems.

The Company expects to report consolidated Q2 revenues of approximately $335 million; EBITDA of approximately $170 million and EBIT before impairments of approximately $55 million. In addition, an impairment charge of approximately $10 million is expected related to vessel and equipment retirement.

With the exception of the delay in securing pre-funding for the Triton survey, MultiClient pre-funding is progressing well. Excluding investment in the Triton survey, the Q2 pre-funding for the remaining MultiClient portfolio is approximately 150% of capitalized MultiClient cash investment.

With respect to Triton, a fast track product from the survey is now available and the Company expects sales to be closed during 2H.

Source

Kemp: The Real Shale Revolution

0

By now everyone knows the shale revolution was made possible by the combination of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing. But although fracking has captured the popular imagination, and is often used as a synonym for the whole phenomenon, horizontal drilling was actually the more recent and important breakthrough. Mastery of horizontal drilling around 1990, originally for oil rather than gas exploration, was the decisive innovation that lit the long fuse for the shale revolution that erupted 15 years later.

“Horizontal drilling is the real marvel of engineering and scientific innovation,” David Blackmon wrote in Forbes magazine last year (“Horizontal drilling: a technological marvel ignored”, January 2013).

“While impressive in its own right, the main innovations in fracking have been beefing up the generating horsepower to accommodate horizontal wells rather than vertical ones, and refining of the fluids used to conserve water and create better, longer lasting fractures in the target formation.”

Fracking has captured the imagination because it is controversial, sounds sinister and like an expletive, makes for good headlines, according to Blackmon. But that has obscured the far more important role played by horizontal drilling in enabling oil and gas to be produced from previously inaccessible rock formations, revolutionising energy output and even international relations. 

DAWN OF FRACKING

Fracking has been in widespread use for more than 50 years. U.S. companies began to experiment with using fracturing to release coal seam gas in the 1940s.

“The basic principle behind underground coal gasification seeks to find an economically feasible process of burning coal seams that are so situated that they do not lend themselves to being mined profitably,” the New York Times explained in 1954 (“New tests made to gasify coal”, Oct. 31, 1954).

“The gases captured from burning the coal seams would eventually be turned into usable fuels for commercial or industrial power.” “The test will be performed by hydraulic fracturing,” the paper noted, “in an effort to open up air passages inside the coal seam” to make it burn more freely and produce a greater quantity of natural gas. “Waste petroleum oil bolstered with napalm is pumped into the well by high-pressure pumps. Sand is mixed with the oil. Pressure as high as 12,000 pounds per square inch can be built up.”

“The tremendous pressure cracks the formation and the penetrating liquid oozes into the open channels,” the Times observed. “Kerosene is added to thin the fracturing liquid and the opening is pumped out. The sand remains to prop open the fractures.”

In the next few decades, hydraulic fracture treatments, as well as treatments using concentrated acids to shatter carbonate formations, were performed on tens of thousands of ordinary oil and gas wells across the United States and in other parts of the world (though the use of napalm was eventually phased out). The initial experiments were conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Mines, in conjunction with oilfield services firm Halliburton and others – underscoring the critical role which the federal government has played in association with private enterprise in fostering innovation at every stage in the energy revolution.

THE TURNING POINT

Horizontal drilling is both newer and older than fracking. The first horizontal wells were drilled more than 2,000 years ago to produce water on Iran’s central plateau and in Egypt’s Western Desert at the time of the pharaohs. Horizontal wells were noted by the ancient Greek historian Polybius, who explained how they were used to increase water production. The history of horizontal drilling was related in the January 1996 special edition of Schlumberger’s “Middle East Well Evaluation Review: Horizontal Highlights,” which is worth reading in full.

The modern history of horizontal drilling dates back around 100 years. The first patent for a horizontal drilling technique was issued in 1891. The main application was for dental work but the applicant noted the same techniques could be used for heavy-duty engineering. The first true horizontal oil well was drilled in Texas in 1929. Another one was drilled in Pennsylvania in 1944. China tried horizontal drilling in 1957 and the Soviet Union tried the technique in the 1960s and 1970s, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (“Drilling sideways: a review of horizontal well technology and its domestic application”, April 1993). But horizontal drilling was expensive, costing up to three times as much as conventional vertical wells, and therefore remained rare. The turning point when horizontal drilling went mainstream can be dated quite precisely.

“Before 1990, horizontal drilling was not a popular technique. The oil industry only drilled horizontal wells as a last resort,” Schlumberger explained.

“The global total for 1989 was just over 200 horizontal wells. In 1990, that total leapt to almost 1,200 wells, with nearly 1,000 of these drilled in the United States.”

The extra cost for drilling horizontally had shrunk to just 17 percent, according to the EIA, as more companies experimented with the technique and benefited from learning curve effects. To drill horizontal wells quickly and cost effectively, the industry had to master the use of flexible drill pipe and steerable down-hole motors, as well as technology enabling drillers to monitor changes in the rock in real time so the well bore can be kept within the target formation.  

THE LONG FUSE

Most oil and gas is found in sedimentary basins where the rock formations underground are layered like a stack of pancakes. The most promising formations may only be a few hundred feet thick, even if they extend for hundreds of square miles in area. For that reason, vertical wells only come into contact with the reservoir rock for a few hundred feet. By contrast, a well drilled through the target formation horizontally can contact the reservoir for hundreds of metres or even several kilometres.

Originally, horizontal drilling was restricted to formations which were hard to produce because they had low permeability (like shale and chalk), or were nearing exhaustion, or where conventional drilling produced too much water too quickly and not enough oil and gas.

French oil firm Elf Aquitaine drilled the first modern horizontal wells in southwest France and in the Mediterranean off Italy in the early 1980s. BP used horizontal wells at Prudhoe Bay in Alaska to minimise unwanted water and gas intrusions into its oil reservoir. But from 1990, the technique started to proliferate. Most of the early wells were drilled into the Austin Chalk in Texas at the Giddings Field and Pearsall Field, as many as 850 in 1990 alone. Most of the rest were drilled into North Dakota’s Bakken, according to the EIA. By August 1990, horizontal wells were producing 70,000 barrels per day of oil in Texas.

In 1986, Oman’s national oil company drilled three horizontal wells into a problematic reservoir, with disappointing results. But from 1990, a much more ambitious and successful programme was begun. By the end of 1994, Petroleum Development Oman had drilled more than 200 horizontal wells. In the early 1990s, more than 50 horizontal wells were also drilled in Abu Dhabi, and Saudi Arabia also embraced the technique for its depleted Watra oil field in the Neutral Zone shared with Kuwait, according to Schlumberger.

AMBITIONS FULFILLED

The tremendous potential of horizontal drilling was recognised right from the start. “Success led some people to speculate that by the end of the century 50 percent of all new wells drilled in the United States would be horizontal,” Schlumberger wrote in 1996. That prediction turned out to be premature – but only by a few years. The number of oil and gas wells being drilled horizontally overtook the combined number of vertical and directional (slanted) wells for the first time in March 2010.

Two-thirds of oil and gas wells are now drilled horizontally, according to the weekly rig counts published by oilfield services company Baker Hughes. It took roughly a decade of experimentation, between 1993 and 2003, to work out how to combine horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in the Barnett shale in Texas, an approach pioneered by George Mitchell at the eponymous Mitchell Energy.

Many of the improvements developed producing gas from the Barnett were then applied back to oil production from North Dakota’s Bakken and then the Eagle Ford shale in Texas. From 2003, however, the number of wells drilled horizontally has grown exponentially. In fact, horizontal wells have largely replaced vertical and directional wells, on account of their greater reservoir contact and efficiency.  

The shift was foreseen by Schlumberger: “In simple terms, horizontal wells allow us to do things more efficiently than vertical wells. It would be short-sighted to ignore a technique which offers improved drainage in typical reservoirs and more discrete compartments in complex reservoirs, while helping reduce gas and water coning.”

LESSONS LEARNED

Commentators often write about the shale revolution as if it began in Texas in the early years of the 21st century. But no revolution emerges from nowhere. The fuse for the shale revolution was lit at least at decade earlier. The authors of articles about horizontal drilling back in the late 1980s and mid-1990s would have been surprised it is seen as a 21st century phenomenon given how much of the revolution had been anticipated 20 years earlier.

Commentators, particularly those sceptical about fracking, also draw a sharp distinction between “good” conventional oil and gas well and “bad” unconventional fracked ones. But history shows there is no clear division between conventional and unconventional oil and gas production. Fracking and horizontal drilling have both been widely applied in both conventional and unconventional contexts. Techniques pioneered to extract oil and gas from conventional but complicated formations have then been applied back into unconventional contexts, and vice versa. Finally, the history of fracking and horizontal drilling demonstrates the long lead times needed to perfect and diffuse new technologies.

New technologies often go unrecognised, at least by those outside the field, for years before they burst into mainstream discourse. So the next generation of technologies which will revolutionise oil and gas production are probably already out there being practised on a small scale – waiting to be improved and discovered more widely.

Source

Minister: India Disallows Reliance From Cost Recovery Of $2.4B

0

India has disallowed Reliance Industries Ltd from recovering $2.376 billion invested to develop offshore gas fields in the D6 block on the country’s east coast as output has fallen drastically and is way below the promised volumes, the oil minister said. Under India’s exploration policy, the government allows companies to first recover their costs from oil and gas revenue, and subsequently share profits with the government.

Reliance had set up facilities to produce 80 million cubic metres a day (mmscmd), but actual gas production has been much lower, resulting in underutilisation and creation of surplus inventories, Dharmendra Pradhan told lawmakers in a written reply. He said notices have been issued to Reliance, which is the block operator, for disallowance of cost recovery. The D1 and D3 gas fields in the block were to produce at a peak rate of 80 mmscmd in 2012-13 but actual production never reached that level. In April-June this year, production from the two fields averaged just 8.05 mmscmd, he said.

The government disallowed Reliance to recover $1.797 billion as on March 2013, which had risen to $2.376 billion by March 2014, Pradhan said. Because of disallowance of cost recovery to Reliance and its partners BP and Niko Resources, the government has raised an additional claim of $195 million as profit petroleum for a period up to March 31, 2014, Pradhan said. Reliance had said earlier that unexpected geology caused the decline in output and drilling more wells would not help, but this has been rejected by the oil ministry, which believes output has fallen due to non-drilling of the promised number of wells.

“The issue is currently under arbitration,” he said.

Source